Monday, October 31, 2011

Happy Halloween To Myself

It is a very slow Halloween this year.  There are hardly any trick-or-treat kids stopping by (kind of a bad neighborhood) and the television is void of Halloween specials.  I thought I would maximize my October post count and do a short entry for Halloween.  I might do some late night horror movie watching and enjoy myself a little more.

Other than that, I finally discovered Fruit Ninja tonight.  I downloaded the Lite version and had such a blast that I coughed up the 99 cents for it.  The full version is worth it.  While playing, I do my usual thing and listen to Dr. Michael Savage while distracting my hands with something else.  The news is still chugging along even on the Holidays.  Tea Party presidential candidate (formally an R) Herman Cain is facing the shameless media single-handedly with baseless accusations of "sexual harassment."  Dr. Savage surprised me with his attack against the "liberated" feminists and their rape culture.  "All it takes is an accusation" [may have been worded differently slightly] says Savage while comparing our current judicial system to that of the former Soviet Union.  I am surprised because Dr. Savage, despite my great respect for the man and his achievements, wasn't above misandry in past shows (It is pathetic how Firefox doesn't recognize "misandry" as real word.).  One show some months ago has a female (who else) caller saying how women use sarcasm and condescending language to men because "women have more common sense."  I know this is far from the truth; that woman has more common sense in her own psychosis.  Dr. Savage, instead of pointing out this woman's obvious sexism, agreed highly with her and proceeded to have a conversation with the hateful woman.  He does have a more traditional background, so I guess it is hard to hold it against him.  I am just so thrilled though that Dr. Savage is willing to point out the reality of men having their ENTIRE LIVES derailed now and for the rest of their unfortunate lives by something as simple and baseless as a false accusation.  I wouldn't mind having a pizza one day with Uncle Savage and talking about life.

Off of Michael Savage's website, there is a link to a YouTube video filmed by a former citizen of the ol' Soviet Union where he exposes the bigotry of the OWS scum and drops the bombshell on the idiots about seeing the atrocities of the Soviet Union first hand:

Yes, this lady woman thinks North Koreans are treated fairly.

Aside from that, I am thinking I might do a post about Herman Cain in the near future.  The man is an inspiration for all.  He is well educated, a former CEO, and he worked from the ground up through the ranks to where he is today.  No, unlike Obama, Cain didn't need affirmative action to get where he is today.  I can hear the intelligence and honesty in this man's voice.  I have been following him closely for the past year now, and I am getting more and more excited by his efforts against the two scheming political parties and the in-bed media.

As Dr. Savage coined back in the nineties: "Beware of the Government-Media Complex."

Happy Halloween!

Forsaken Eagle

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Crusadors Against Halloween "White Racism" and the Difference Between Do-Gooders and Doing Good

While browsing Yahoo! News last night, I came across an article praising a group of individuals campaigning against "racist" Halloween costumes.  The foundation of this group known as Students Teaching Against Racism in Society should be fairly obvious.  They are, at first glance, a group of fresh-out-of-high-school do-gooders who feel they are still living in the 1950's.  Racism is just shorthand for "white racism," but the shorthand must be fitting since it seems only white men are capable of hatred in the minds of brainwashed dummies.  The group shows minorities (who else?) being offended by pictures of whites in minority cultural costumes for Halloween.  I don't see why dressing up in a costume for Halloween would be offensive in the first place.  However, since it is white people, then there must be oppression and hatred at work here!  Never mind costumes depicting white-trash rednecks drinking beer or fat tourists with cameras.  These are just funny gags that poke fun at the ridiculousness of white people.

Then on down the list of reader comments comes more of the anti-white racism.  The top "Most Replied" comment at the moment is a user named Lillian, a self-proclaimed Asian.  Her opinion (which she has the right to have) is that she doesn't think white people understand what it's like being a minority because we were "born white and have no idea what it's like to not be white."  If that is not racist, then I would be a monkey's uncle.  A more accurate description would be: "Many white people do not understand what it is like to be a minority in the country they were born and raised in."  This would be more correct considering most white people stay in their own countries, just like Africans, Arabs, Asians, and Hispanics.  Instead, what I got from Lillian's comment is more like this: "I think all white people are inherently racist and oppressive, and they have NEVER been oppressed.  Therefore I believe a white person does not understand what it is like to be a member of another race."  At least with my version I sound honest about "my" hatred of white people.

In my honest opinion, if anybody claims they are not racist, then they are either lying or mentally disordered.  This goes for all races of both sexes.  The Left took the original definition of racism and turned it into a tool of fear.  According to the original definition of "racism," racism is the desire for one to prefer the company of another who is the same race.  When you take this definition into account, I guess the most racist country on earth would be China.  Is it really wrong for somebody to have anxiety around a member of a different race?  An evolutionary biologist would think that this is a survival technique: to avoid the unfamiliar.  I am a huge proponent of the school of thought where people who try to regulate natural human behavior often cause undesirable consequences.  As a result of the crusade against "white racism," there is an ever growing divide between the races, particularly between whites and blacks.  This education system tries to point out and emphasize the differences between us.  At the same time, minorities are taught that they are owed something while whites are taught that they are responsible for all of the world's suffering.  What do the Leftists think is going to happen?  I'll tell them what I see: whites growing more resentful of the minorities and the minorities attacking whites (both physically and indirectly) for their supposed inherent racism.  There is no advantage to developing these victim classes and revenge legislation.

My own heritage is that of Mid-European descent.  My ancestors came to America around the beginning of the 20th century.  I am no history major, but I am pretty sure slavery was long gone by then.  How could I be descended from a bunch of slave holders?  On top of that, most of those "evil, racist Southerners" were poor whites.  I constantly hear about how all whites in the South owned slaves and only blacks lived in poverty.  There was only a very small group of whites who owned slaves.  If we are going to talk about giving aid to oppressed people, why not throw some money my way?  My family was definitely low class in Alabama and had to work hard to maintain a living.  This is pretty much the same today relative to the great rise in the standard of living (because of American Exceptional-ism you hate-America-first goons).  "White Privilege" isn't something I get to enjoy any damn time I want.

Ironically, it seems it is the upper-middle class whites living in gated communities up in the Yankee states who make the most noise about racism and oppression.  If an outsider looking in wants to see the truth of the matter, look at people like Robert Krentz who led by example.  Robert Krentz to me seemed to be one American who believed in the desire of foreigners to reach the United States and start a better life.  Krentz owned a ranch along the Arizona-Mexico border.  He is known for giving food, water, and aid to illegals crossing over from Mexico out of his own volition.  Putting myself in his shoes, I think I would have seen many fathers, mothers, and children braving the Sonoran Desert heat to reach greener pastures.  However, as time went on and the borders became more porous, illegals in the form of drug dealers (many of whom are trained soldiers) and possibly terrorists in Hispanic disguise started massing across the border.  Krentz's property started taking damage and he had his house broken into.  He tried to defend his property against the barbarians.  His kindness was turned to hostility, and eventually his life was lost.  In the Leftists' worldview, this man must have appeared to the rats in college as just another right-wing redneck out to shoot 'im some brown people.  I will for as long as I live defend this man's honor as both a warrior who protected himself and his wife against armed invaders and a true America giving a humble hand to those who want to live the American dream.  Maybe the truly privileged should start walking the walk INSTEAD OF TALKING THE TALK.

This is the sum of my rant against this article on Yahoo! News and a group of students who are more interested in being do-gooders than doing what is right.  I think Dr. Michael Savage said it best about the do-gooders killing us all.  Whether this killing is literal as displayed by infamous do-gooders like Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot, or this killing is the cultural suicide the Western world is determined to follow through with.  It is my personal duty as a human being determined to pull humanity out of a vicious cycle of historical ignorance to learn to do good by action with no expectation of return.

Forsaken Eagle

Thursday, October 13, 2011

WND Publishes a Fair Insight of the MRM

Paul Elam of A Voice for Men linked an article in a relatively mainstream website called World Net Daily.  A website known for its more conservative lean, writer Phil Elmore conjured up an article about the "civil rights movement we've never heard of."  Elmore gives a crash course into the MRM (Men's Rights Movement) for his readers.  However, what sets this article apart from other mainstream sources is the objectivity it has towards the MRM.  Elmore chooses not to denigrate men but simply spread information on a movement that has been downplayed for speaking against feminist zealotry.  What is the best way to gain insight onto a population for those who are under informed or misinformed entirely with bigotry?  Mr. Elmore chose to go right to the horse's mouth and reported the words of MRAs, such as Paul Elam, John the Other, Angry Harry, Dr. Tara Palmatier, and Bernard Chapin.  Phil Elmore is what seems to be a rare commodity in the mainstream: a man who knows about and understands the purpose of the Men's Rights Movement.

In addition, Elmore also gives a mention of the controversial (in feminist and white knight circles) website is an online database of female criminals and bigots.  It covers false rape / domestic violence accusers, murders, rapists and pedophiles, and slanderers.  Covering a demographic deemed above critical overview, is an important step in achieving fairness in the civil rights field.

With all of the excitement in the air, I am filled with optimism right now that there will be future occurrences of newly minted MRAs, MRAs coming out of the shadows bravely willing to risk their career for truth and justice, and even those who might not care for the movement but feel it necessary to report the facts fairly.  As a movement, there is a lot of hate being directed at men who do not conform to the present culture of the United States.  It is a long time coming considering women have had their revolution to do whatever it is they feel like.  Then, in an ironic fashion, women require men to maintain their age old roles as males and tolerate female behavior irregardless if women do or do not follow their traditional roles.  It is a great pleasure to see writers such as Phil Elmore giving the MRM the time of day in the sensible notion of fair journalism.

I hope to see more article like this in the near future.  Until then, there is always the great articles found on A Voice for Men, The-Spearhead, and Angry Harry's website.  I will certainly be watching out for more great hit pieces from the talented writers within the MRM.

Forsaken Eagle

Monday, October 10, 2011

Free-Range Men: An Observation

I just finished reading this great article by an MRA on The-Spearhead regarding the MGTOW, Zeta Males, Herbivorous Men, or as the author calls them Free-Range Men.  Zed, the author, contributes his observations about the odd occurrence of men rejecting social, cultural, and traditional roles placed upon them.  He compares the shift of priority for men in Japan and the West, particularly the United States.  Men are rapidly rejecting the expectations of marrying to women (who no longer want to behave like women) in favor of using all of their leftover time and income on themselves solely.  Zed makes the final observation of feminism's influence on Japanese and American men as a result rather than a backlash.  Feminism has removed social expectations from women, but men are still expected to follow in their tradition "manly" roles.  Men have responded by rejecting the husband / father roles expected of them, to the great displeasure of feminists I assure you, and have instead taken to their own paths through their short lives.

With people like Bill Bennett spewing garbage about how men need to "man up" to live up to his ideals, I personally have come to really question every political spectrum in this country, Left, Right, and Center.  Every which way one turns is somebody who expects men to behave in a certain way, and women are usually suggested to behave a certain way if they feel like (For example, socially conservative women sometimes live the traditional role but will quickly take on whatever role she feels like in order to meet her own wants.).  I am thankful that there are communities on the web like A Voice for Men and The-Spearhead where the hypocrisy of the Feminist Movement is called out and men-going-their-own-way are given fair representations instead of condemnation.
I'm not sure what title I would like to place on this movement.  However, I do know that the ideals of the movement transcend all names that could be plastered onto it, positive or negative.  I know from experience the great difficulties of trying to please other people, especially 21st-century women.  There is nothing but pain in the pursuit to please the ideals of others as I have pretended to be something I am not.  I want to try to follow the examples of the Japanese "herbivore" men and the "free-range" men and simply live to my own ideals without the permission of anyone else.  I am filled with optimism for the future of this social trend.  Feminists with their white knight cohorts will try harder and harder to grant themselves more "liberation" while keeping men in their traditional roles for the sole benefit of women.  This selfishness will only backfire as the end-product of the Feminist Movement comes to pass: the male revolution.

Forsaken Eagle

Saturday, October 8, 2011

An MRA's Email to Saint Louis University

I moments ago read and posted at an article on the website A Voice for Men concerning Saint Louis University's vague policy on rape.  The policy expresses emphasis on the importance of "consent" in sexual relationships between students.  The founder and top poster of A Voice for Men Paul Elam drafted an email rebuttal to the rather sneaky language used in the University's policy.  When the topic concerns rape, one should become aware that feminism is not too far off from the scene, and Elam highlights the trappings of the policy that serve the feminists' agenda proudly.  Mainly: "Men are rapists and women are victims."

Against the odds, Paul Elam stands firm in his text by labeling his message as "punishment, not dialogue."  With reference to his great contributions to exposing a real-life feminazi called Mary Kellett and another school, Mount Royal University, he delightfully lectures that anyone who searches will find Saint Louis University and see the blatant bigotry they use in policy decisions.  In short, what goes around comes around.  SLU will become, by word of mouth, another symbol of modern fascism in America.

I wanted to use this space to help spread the word about SLU.  Tyranny should be opposed wherever it may appear.  I also want to point out that one person's utopia is another person's dystopia.  The universities must come to understand that discriminating against anyone, despite any perceived past crimes, is an intolerable act in this day and age.

Forsaken Eagle